naano
naano
The B2B LinkedIn creator marketplace
Browse all creators
Ashwanth S

Ashwanth S

INAISoftwareGrowth / GTM
Available to book
6.6K
Followers
10.5K
Est. reach
1.9%
Engagement

About

Most managing partners I work with can describe the exact moment. A startup you met at a conference last year just announced a seed round. You read the headline. You already know what they need, what it is worth over the next decade, and that the window is about thirty days. You also know you have no warm way in. By the time you write something that does not feel cold, two other firms have proposals in. You scroll past. You get back to the return on your desk. That is not a marketing problem. It is a timing problem. Referrals built your firm. They also have a ceiling, and the ceiling is the hours you have left after the client work is done. Between January and April there are none. Every funded company that signs with another firm in those months is not one fee. It is ten years of recurring work now compounding for someone else. I build the system that closes that gap. It watches the public signals your competitors do not, SEC Form D filings, funding rounds, new finance hires, and surfaces the handful of companies that entered the market for an accountant in the last seven days. Each one arrives with a draft message written in your voice, waiting for your approval. Nothing sends until you say yes. Your name never lands on something you did not read first. You own the system and the data it builds. It is not a seat you rent. Month three is sharper than month one, because it learns from what actually books calls. The same signal-and-outreach layer runs in production for a Fortune 500 consulting firm ($15B+ revenue), where nine agents replaced a six-person research team, and for a capital-projects advisory firm now sourcing 500 qualified leads a week. If growth still depends on who you happen to run into, that is the thing worth fixing. Reply "INFRA" and I will show you what your Monday morning could look like.

AISoftwareGrowth / GTM

Audience & average metrics

6.6K
Followers
10.5K
Est. reach
40
Avg reactions
82
Avg comments
1.9%
Engagement
IN
Based in

Stats updated 2 d ago

Recent posts

image

Claude is running my entire B2B revenue operation. Research, outreach, content, qualification, proposals. One system, zero headcount. Most founders still use Claude like a chat window. Ask a question, paste the answer, repeat tomorrow. That is a faster intern, not leverage. And the pipeline still depends on whoever they can afford to hire. Here is what most people have not clocked yet: the work that fills a revenue team's week (list building, prospect research, first drafts, follow-ups, call prep, proposals) is exactly the work Claude runs end to end once real infrastructure sits underneath it. I compiled my full setup into one playbook: → 61 skills covering research, outreach, content, qualification, onboarding and proposals → 47 systems Claude calls on its own to enrich, verify, draft and send → The install commands and the exact order to set everything up The same architecture runs in production at a Fortune 500 consulting firm: 9 agents, 3,000+ qualified leads a month, replacing what 6 full-time SDRs did manually. Everything in the playbook runs in my own pipeline today. It works at 3am without anyone watching. Want it? 1️⃣ Connect with me 2️⃣ Comment "SYSTEM" below (I'll DM you the playbook once we're connected.) ♻️ Repost for priority access.

2128
image

Everyone's racing to buy the smartest AI tool. I run my entire growth ops from one terminal. No team. $350 a month, all in. Here's the part nobody wants to hear: the tool was never the edge. --- 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝘁 One file that loads my whole business context on every session. A knowledge base split into folders: buyers, offers, past deals, voice. Every tool I touch wired into the same window: email, calendar, CRM, enrichment, my own signal monitors. → "Who entered the market this week?" It tells me. → "Draft the first message in my voice." Done. → "What did we say to this firm last month?" Pulled in seconds. One terminal. Zero tab switching. $350, not a headcount. --- 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗮𝘁 Anyone can buy the same model I use. Anyone can buy the same lead list. What they can't buy is knowing which company just crossed the line into "we need help now," before their competitor does. That is not a tool. That is a signal layer. And it compounds. Every deal, every reply, every won client makes the next call sharper. Six months in, the system knows my market better than most people I've worked with. --- 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗶𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝘂𝗻 𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺 A partner sees the $3M raise on LinkedIn Monday morning. He knows exactly what that company needs. He also knows the window is thirty days. By the time he writes a message that doesn't feel cold, two other firms already have proposals in. He didn't lose on skill. He lost on timing. The best firm in the room loses to the one who shows up first with a warm reason. The model is a commodity. The list is a commodity. Knowing who to talk to, and when, before anyone else does, is the whole game. What does your growth actually run on right now? Referrals and luck, or a system that's watching? ♻️ Repost if this reframed how you think about your pipeline.

395
image

Everyone is using Claude to write LinkedIn posts. I used it to book 7 sales calls a week. Without sending a single manual DM. Writing content is maybe 1% of what Claude can actually do. Last month, one signal-first system did the rest: 1. Watches for people already showing buying intent 2. Surfaces who viewed, engaged, or commented on your work 3. Drafts outreach in your voice, not a template 4. Holds every message for your approval before it sends 5. Follows up on its own so nothing slips through The difference is intent. You are not blasting cold strangers. You are starting conversations with people already circling what you do. They raised their hand. You just show up first. I build this exact infrastructure for enterprise revenue teams. Same engine, now small enough for a founder to run solo. Nothing sends without your yes. And the system is yours to keep. I put the whole thing into one playbook: → The LinkedIn workflows that turn signals into booked calls → The Claude prompts that write messages people actually reply to → How to surface warm prospects every morning → The follow-up system that keeps the pipeline moving Want the entire system playbook?  1️⃣ Comment "MEETING" +  2️⃣ Connect with me, I will send it over. ♻️ Repost for priority access

47110
image

BYE BYE DELOITTE. HELLO CLAUDE OPUS 4.8. We compiled 20 Deloitte-style skills that push Opus to its limits and turn Claude into an enterprise-grade client acquisition engine for boutique CPA firms. 1/ A signal monitoring skill Form D tracker, funding alert, job change watcher. Claude watches 8 public data sources so you see the startup the day it enters the market, before every other CPA in your city does. 2/ Prospect research skills Firm profiler, ICP scorer, city deal flow, pre-contact card. Claude doesn't just find names. It ranks companies by fit, counts funded rounds in your metro in the last 60 days, and pulls the five data points you need before a message is written. 3/ Outreach drafting skills Email writer, LinkedIn DM, partner voice. Claude drafts in your documented voice, anchored to the specific signal that surfaced the company. Not a template. A researched first message. 4/ Approval workflow skills Review queue, edit protocol, send confirmation. Nothing goes out under your firm's name until you read it and approve it. Every send. Every time. 5/ Reply handling skills Positive reply, neutral hold, negative exit. Three scenarios. Three clear protocols. No improvising when a partner at a target firm writes back. 6/ Pre-call intelligence skills Call brief, objection map, next step guide. Delivered 30 minutes before the call. What triggered the interest, what they will push back on, and what to send within 4 hours after. 7/ A reusable client development system The same engine every engagement: Monitor → Research → Draft → Approve → Handle → Brief. This isn't Claude giving generic business development advice. Want FREE access to all 20 Deloitte-style CPA Client Acquisition Skills? 1️⃣ Like this post 👍 2️⃣ Comment ""SIGNALS"" below (Make sure we are connected) P.S. Repost for priority access ♻️

4055
image

Built 21 outbound skills for SDR teams. They plug directly into Claude Opus 4.8 No dashboard. No new tool to learn. Just ask questions about your outbound engine and it works. Here are 7 skills that come up the most: 1/ Lead scoring Claude scores every lead based on ICP fit, intent signals, firmographics, and buying probability so reps know exactly where to focus. 2/ Personalization at scale Need personalized outreach for 500 leads? Claude researches every account and writes contextual openers in seconds. 3/ Campaign diagnostics Reply rates dropping? Claude identifies whether the issue is targeting, messaging, sequence fatigue, or deliverability. 4/ Objection analysis Analyzes inbound replies and groups objections like budget, timing, no interest, or competitor lock-in. 5/ Deliverability monitor Tracks spam risk, bounce spikes, domain health, and inbox placement before campaigns break. 6/ Pipeline leak detection Shows where deals are dying across your funnel: Lead → Reply → Meeting → Opportunity → Close 7/ Full outbound audit Reviews your entire system: targeting, enrichment, copy, sequencing, and conversion bottlenecks. 21 skills total. 5 categories: research, outreach, diagnostics, sales, strategy. How it works: → Connect your outbound stack to Claude via MCP → Drop the skills folder → Ask questions in plain English → Get answers using live data No API complexity. No CSV exports. No tab switching. Want the full system? 1️⃣ Like the post 2️⃣ Comment "OUTBOUND" and I’ll send all 21 skills (Make sure we are connected so it lands in your DMs.) ♻️ Repost for Priority Access

73140
image

Claude can build you a clickable prototype before you finish describing it. Most people still only use it to write paragraphs. It quietly turned into a design tool. Not "generate an image." Real design work you can actually use: → Slides: full pitch and review decks → Prototype: clickable, interactive flows → Product wireframe: lo-fi screens and user flows → Doc: resumes, one-pagers, PDFs → Animation: motion and short video → Blank canvas: anything that fits no box The gap between a generic result and something you would actually ship is not the tool. It is how you brief it, and how you direct the second draft. So I put the whole system into one guide: 1. What each of the 6 modes is for 2. Copy-paste prompts for every one 3. The 5-part formula that gets pro output 4. The hidden skills most people miss (critique, accessibility, dev handoff) 5. How to chain them into a full design sprint inside one chat It is the playbook I wish I had when I started building with Claude. Want the playbook? 1️⃣ Like the post 2️⃣ Comment "DESIGN" and I will send it over. (Make sure we are connected so it lands in your DMs.) ♻️ Repost for Priority Access

71190
video

This AI replaces your $5,000/month LinkedIn ghostwriter. And unlike yours, it already knows what to post. Most people "use AI" for LinkedIn like this: → "Write me a post about X" → "Make this hook punchier" → "Rewrite this so it sounds human" That's not a system. That's a slot machine. Generic output. 200 views. Zero leads. Every time. So I built Pulse. --- Not a prompt. Not a chatbot. A full content engine that studies what is already winning in your niche, then writes in your exact voice. Here is how it actually works: → It tracks the top creators in your space, post by post → It scores every post by real engagement and separates the S-tier winners from the noise → It reverse-engineers WHY each one worked: the hook, the structure, the CTA → It writes you 3 brand-matched drafts, trained on your voice, not a template everyone else is using → It reviews its own output and gets sharper every single week A five-agent team runs the whole thing. Research, copywriting, visuals, quality control. On autopilot. The old way: stare at a blank screen, hire a ghostwriter, hope it lands. The new way: open the app, pick the winner, post. This is what happens when you stop prompting AI and start building infrastructure around it. --- I recorded a full walkthrough of how I built it. Want it? 1️⃣ Follow + Connect 2️⃣ Comment "PULSE" below (I'll send you the complete build breakdown plus the video once you're connected) P.S. Repost for priority access

36142
image

🚨BREAKING: I rebuilt my entire outbound system around Fable. Get the AI-SDR workflow free for the next 72 hours. Most teams still use AI for one-off tasks. → Write this email. → Summarize this account. → Find this lead. → Draft this follow-up. Then the human still has to do the actual SDR work. That is not the point of an AI-SDR. A real AI-SDR should help run the full client acquisition workflow: → Find high-fit accounts   → Research the company   → Score the ICP fit   → Identify decision-makers   → Pull buying signals   → Write personalized outreach   → Create follow-ups   → Handle replies   → Update the CRM   → Surface the best meetings to chase  The difference is not better prompts. It is better execution. I built Fable to turn outbound from a manual SDR process into a workflow engine. It does not just write messages. It helps move accounts from cold list to booked meeting with fewer check-ins, cleaner research, and better follow-through. That means: → Fewer manual tasks. → Faster prospect research. → Sharper personalization. → Cleaner pipeline visibility. → More booked meetings. This is what AI-SDR should have been from the start. Not a chatbot. An operator for outbound. Comment “SDR” if you want the exact workflow I use to get booked meetings on autopilot with Fable. 1/ Like this post   2/ Make sure we are connected   3/ Comment “"SDR"” below  ♻️ Repost for priority access.

4286
image

This AI agent generates full Instagram carousel systems in 15 minutes. GPT Image 2 + Structured Skill workflow. Upload the logo, drop a few style references, describe what you need, and it writes the prompt and generates the concept automatically. The AG1 set above is a real output. No designer needed for the first round. No three rounds of direction-setting before a single slide gets made. Here's what it handles: → Carousel slide systems → Brand kit concepts and variations → Creative direction before production → Pitch deck visual assets I've been using this before every client brief. It cuts the time between idea and visual by more than half. Sharing the full agent + workflow. Comment "BRAND" and I'll send it over. Need to be connected. P.S. Repost for Priority DM.

2667
image

The creative director opened a spreadsheet with 47 ad concepts inside it. Three months of work. Seventeen rounds of feedback. One exhausted team. Zero of them had been tested yet. --- This 8-figure D2C brand was spending $150K a month on Meta and Facebook ads. But their creative process was broken at the root. Every new concept went through the same loop: → Brief the team → Wait two weeks for assets → Debate internally → Run everything at once → Watch the budget burn before the data came back clean They weren't testing creatives. They were launching them and hoping. No signal isolation. No structured variation. No way to know if the hook, the visual, or the offer was what actually moved the needle. When one ad underperformed, nobody knew why. When one hit, nobody could replicate it. --- We built a custom ad creative testing system that changed that entirely. The system isolated variables by layer. Hook. Visual format. CTA. Proof element. Each one tested independently before any full-budget push. A scoring engine ranked incoming creative concepts before production, flagging which combinations had the highest prior performance signal. Winners got automatically promoted. Losers got cut in 48 hours, not two weeks. The team stopped debating. The data decided. Within 90 days, monthly spend scaled from $150K to $600K. Not because they spent more. Because they finally knew what was working before they doubled down on it. --- Owning the system is what changes the economics. If you want to implement this for your brand, book a call.

81

Who engages with you

Who likes and comments on this creator's posts, inferred from their LinkedIn titles.

By seniority
Founder / C-level20%
VP / Head / Director1%
Manager / Lead8%
Senior IC2%
Other68%
By function
Engineering / Data 26%Founders 22%Marketing 18%Sales / BD 10%Finance / VC 2%HR / Talent 1%

Pricing

252 €
Price per post
3 posts · 600 €
Bundle
Book a post
Ashwanth S

Want to work with Ashwanth S?

Book this creator for a LinkedIn post on Naano - fixed price, you keep full creative alignment, they keep their voice.

Fixed price per post Keeps their authentic voice Booked & paid on Naano
Get started on Naano
naano

What is Naano

Naano connects B2B SaaS companies with vetted LinkedIn micro-creators. Brands brief creators, creators publish authentic posts in their own voice, and you only pay for results.

Flat fee per post

Book a creator for a fixed price per LinkedIn post, from €10.

Pay per click

Top up a wallet and pay €1.90–2.90 per qualified click - no minimum, no retainer.

Browse all creators